Dr. Tim Jay serves as MCLA's Faculty Athletics Representative.
To learn more about Dr. Jay, please click here.
FACULTY ATHLETICS REPRESENTATIVE HANDBOOK
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Table of Contents
· A Message for Presidents and Chancellors
· Introduction
· Faculty Athletics Representatives and the NCAA
· Faculty Athletics Representatives and Campus Activity
· Faculty Athletics Representatives and FARA
· Faculty Athletics Representatives and Athletics
Conferences
Appendices
A. Essential Faculty Athletics Representative Responsibilities and
Support Services
B. Checklist of Faculty Athletics Representatives Duties
C. Statement of the Role of the Faculty Athletics
Representative
D. Resolution Regarding the Appointment of Faculty Athletics
Representatives
A Message for Presidents and Chancellors
This handbook has been prepared by the Faculty Athletics
Representatives Association (FARA) in cooperation with the NCAA
membership services staff. The most important message to be
conveyed is the following:
Faculty athletics representatives can only be as effective as
their institutional circumstances permit.
Circumstances that would tend to support a meaningful role for the
faculty athletics representative include: (1) a position
description which clearly specifies both authority and
responsibility; (2) a commitment of institutional resources so that
the faculty athletics representative has sufficient time, clerical
assistance, discretionary travel privileges and similar support;
and (3) recognition by both the chief executive officer and the
faculty governance structure of the importance of a significant
faculty athletics representative role in the institutional
governance and oversight of the intercollegiate athletics program.
Ultimately, faculty athletics representatives can only be as
effective as their chief executive officers and the faculty whom
they represent equip them to be.
The need for a significant faculty athletics representative role
depends on institutional circumstances. A number of factors will
play important parts in defining an appropriate faculty athletics
representatives role, including (1) the extent of national or
regional prominence of the intercollegiate athletics program; (2)
its previous record with respect to compliance with NCAA and other
applicable rules; and (3) the division of authority and
responsibility – inside vs. outside the athletics department
– for the institution control of intercollegiate athletics.
Each chief executive officer, with advice from the faculty
governance structure and the athletics administration, should
determine the extent to which a faculty athletics representative
presence in the athletics program is desirable or required. In
assessing this role, the chief executive officer should fully
contemplate institutional responsibilities under the NCAA’s
requirements of academic integrity, institutional control and the
well-being of student-athletes. An appropriate check-and-balance
system should be devised so that inadvertent violations of, or
willful disregard for, NCAA principles will be detected,
self-reported and corrected.
This handbook provides guidance to the chief executive officer,
faculty athletics representative and others about the potential
role of the faculty athletics representative, both on and beyond
the campus. For those who do not wish to study this document in its
entirety, a list of the essential faculty athletics
representatives’ duties and responsibilities as well as a
checklist of duties are provided in Appendices A and B, along with
suggestions or guidelines for the extent of institutional support
that may be required.
Introduction
This handbook has been developed to identify ways in which faculty
athletics representatives are or should be involved in the
administration of intercollegiate athletics programs as conducted
under the regulations of the NCAA. The document may be considered
as both descriptive and prescriptive of appropriate roles of the
faculty athletics representative. The responsibilities of faculty
athletics representatives differ widely within and among the NCAA
division classifications. This diversity occurs because of
differences in the scope and importance of athletics programs and
because of the various structures of “institutional
control” that have been established.
Notwithstanding these differences, NCAA regulations require
intercollegiate athletics programs to be designed as a vital part
of the educational system and the student-athlete to be an integral
part of the student body. In addition, regulations require
intercollegiate athletics programs to be conducted so as to protect
and enhance the educational and physical welfare of the
student-athletes. These requirements commit member institutions to
the maintenance of the highest regard for the academic and personal
well-being of our student-athletes. These areas of student life
traditionally have involved significant faculty participation and
oversight. Because student-athletes are to be students first,
faculty voices and perspectives in the administration and oversight
of intercollegiate athletics programs have been recognized with the
NCAA as legitimate and necessary.
This handbook is intended primarily for new faculty athletics
representatives but is of relevance for chief executive officers,
directors of athletics, senior woman administrators, conference
commissioners, compliance coordinators, faculty governance
officers, members of athletics boards or committees, and other
groups or individuals. The role of the faculty athletics
representative in the “institutional control” of
intercollegiate athletics programs on individual campuses
ultimately will be shaped by the chief executive officer but will
be based in part on input and advice from many of these
constituencies. Hence, a broad audience is both anticipated and
encouraged.
This handbook is organized to describe the activities of faculty
athletics representatives in four significant areas. Chapter
headings focus on faculty athletics representatives’
relationship with the NCAA, the campus, the Faculty Athletics
Representatives Association (FARA) and athletic conferences.
Development of this handbook has been a cooperative endeavor
between FARA and the NCAA national office staffs.
Faculty Athletics Representatives and the NCAA
History of Faculty Involvement in the NCAA.
Faculty voices and influence have been present in the affairs of
the NCAA for as long as the NCAA has been in existence. The
Carnegie Foundation Report on American College Athletics in 1928
attests to the presence of faculty views in the operation of the
NCAA up to that time. In 1980, the NCAA released a study written by
Earl Ramer, which outlined the history of the significant and
continuing roles played by faculty in the NCAA in the decades
before 1980. Shortly after the Ramer Report was published, the NCAA
produced the first Faculty Athletics Representative Handbook, which
was revised in 1987. These reports indicate that faculty athletics
representatives have long been thoroughly integrated into the
infrastructure of the NCAA. Faculty athletics representatives are
prominent in all levels of NCAA governance, excepting those
reserved for chief executive officers, and they continually serve
as points of contact between their campuses and the NCAA in the
regular conduct of intercollegiate athletics programs. The
organizational structure of the NCAA is depicted in Appendix D.
The integration of faculty athletics representatives into NCAA
operations is reflected in the bylaws of the NCAA. A brief review
of this recent legislation follows.
Faculty Athletics Representatives and NCAA Organization,
Legislative Authority and Legislative Process
Articles 4, 5 and 6 of the NCAA Constitution recognize the
involvement of faculty athletics representatives in the
organization, legislative authority and legislative process of the
NCAA and the important role of faculty athletics representatives in
the local institutional control of intercollegiate athletics
programs. Specifically, the NCAA Manuals indicate the following:
Each member institution is required to appoint a faculty
athletics representative. [Constitution 6.1.3]
* Qualifications of those who may serve as faculty athletics
representatives are described in Constitution 6.1.3.
* The faculty athletics representative is recognized as the
representative of the institution and its faculty in the
relationship between the NCAA and the local campus. [Constitution
4.02.2]
* The faculty athletics representative is one of the five
recognized individuals authorized to make contact with the NCAA
membership services staff in normal interaction between the NCAA
and local campuses. The chief executive officer, director of
athletics, senior woman administrator and compliance coordinator
are the other individuals permitted to do so. [Constitution
5.4.1.2.1.2]
Faculty
Athletics Representatives and the NCAA Committee
Structure.
Faculty athletics representatives routinely serve on NCAA
councils, cabinets and committees. Certain NCAA governance units
are required to include faculty athletics representatives in their
membership, and the eligibility of faculty athletics
representatives for other committees is explicitly mentioned in the
NCAA Manuals. Specifically, the Manuals indicate:
* Those who are “on the staff” are eligible for
membership on NCAA committees. “On the staff” is
defined as those individuals who receive a regular salary from a
member institution or organization for the performance of a regular
staff function representing at least 50 percent of the normal
workload for a staff member at that organization or conference. The
standards of Constitutions 4.02.2, 4.02.3 and 6.1.3 are met by most
faculty athletics representatives. Those faculty athletics
representatives that do so are eligible for membership on NCAA
governance units.
* Division I Governance: Bylaw 4.5.1 stipulates that faculty
athletics representatives are eligible for membership on the
Division I Management Council. NCAA bylaws mandate the inclusion of
faculty athletics representatives on the Division I
Academics/Eligibility/Compliance Cabinet [Bylaw 21.6.6.2.1],
Division I Championships/Competition Cabinet [Bylaw 21.6.6.3.1],
Division I Strategic Planning Cabinet [Bylaw 21.6.6.4.1], and
Division I Business/Finance Cabinet [Bylaw 21.6.6.5.1].
* Division II Governance: Bylaw 4.6.1 stipulates that faculty
athletics representatives are eligible for membership on the
Division II Management Council. As members of the Division II
Management Council, faculty athletics representatives may be
eligible to serve on the Division II Administrative Committee
[Bylaw 4.9.1] and Division II Budget and Finance Committee [Bylaw
4.10.1].
* Division III Governance: Bylaw 4.7.1 stipulates that faculty
athletics representatives are eligible for membership on the
Division III Management Council. As members of the Division III
Management Council, faculty athletics representatives may be
eligible to serve on the Division III Administrative Committee.
[Bylaw 4.11.1]
* The NCAA Committee on Athletics Certification is required to
include a faculty athletics representative on its committee. [Bylaw
23.1.1]
Faculty
Athletics Representatives and the NCAA Waivers and Appeals
Process
Faculty Athletics Representatives are identified in the NCAA
Manuals as being among those who are routinely empowered to
prepare, on behalf of their institutions, requests for waivers or
appeals from NCAA legislation or process.
* The faculty athletics representative (or chief executive
officer) is required to sign requests for waivers of
initial-eligibility requirements. [Bylaw 14.3.1.7]
* Any appeal to restore the eligibility of a student-athlete shall
be submitted in the name of the institution by the faculty
athletics representative (or chief executive officer or director of
athletics). [Bylaw 14.14.2]
* The faculty athletics representative (along with the chief
executive officer and director of athletics) must be a signatory of
institutional appeals to the NCAA Administrative Review Panel. In
addition, the faculty athletics representative must be part of any
telephonic call regarding the Administrative Review Panel. [Bylaw
21.3.3.2]
* The faculty athletics representative must be apprised of any
institutional request for waiver of divisional membership
requirements. (Bylaws 20.3.5.2 and 20.9.6.3.6]
* The faculty athletics representative (or chief executive
officer, director of athletics or senior woman administrator) must
appear before the membership of the appropriate division to defend
a request for waiver of divisional membership criteria. [Bylaw
20.5.3.2.2.]
Faculty
Athletics Representatives and the CNAA Enforcement
Process
Faculty athletics representatives are to be included in official
notifications from the NCAA that an official inquiry is being
initiated to determine if rules violations have occurred.
The faculty athletics representative (along with the director of
athletics) is to receive a copy of the letter from the NCAA
enforcement staff to the chief executive officer informing the
chief executive officer that the enforcement staff has determined
that an official inquiry is justified in the investigation of an
alleged violation. [Bylaw 32.5.1]
Faculty Athletics Representatives and Athletics
Certification
Faculty athletics representatives should be an important resource
person both in preparing an institution’s self-study report
and in assisting the NCAA external peer-review team during its
on-site evaluation visit. More than any other person, the faculty
athletics representative is broadly knowledgeable about the
athletics program and campus-wide academic programs and student
services. The faculty athletics representative should be involved
in the preparation of the institution’s self-study report in
each of the four basic areas, and play a leading role in the areas
of academic integrity, governance and commitment to rules
compliance, and commitment to equity, which includes
student-athlete welfare. Active participation in the certification
process also offers an opportunity to inform the campus community
about the important roles performed by the faculty athletics
representative and to review the institutional support and
responsibilities accorded the position.
The faculty athletics representative must hold the basic
qualifications to be included in the pool of peer reviewers in the
athletics certification process. [Bylaw 33.2.3.2.1.1]
Faculty Athletics Representatives and Campus Activity
Faculty Athletics Representatives Provide Advice and Oversight for
Intercollegiate Athletics Programs
Faculty Athletics Representative Credentials and Duties
Individuals who may hold the position of faculty athletics
representative are described in Article 6.1.3 of the NCAA
Constitution: the faculty athletics representative shall be
“... a member of the institution’s faculty or an
administrator who holds faculty rank and shall not hold an
administrative or coaching position in the athletics
department.” The term “faculty athletics
representative” derives from NCAA usage and denotes the
perceived need on the part of the NCAA to involve a faculty
viewpoint in the administration of intercollegiate athletics
programs. Thus, whether the individual is appointed by the chief
executive officer or is elected by the faculty, those who hold this
position are designated faculty athletics representatives. Faculty
athletics representatives provide oversight and advise in the
administration of an institutional athletics program. The working
relationship between the chief executive officer and the faculty
athletics representative is a critically important determinant of
the effectiveness of the faculty athletics representative in
contributing to the local control of the intercollegiate athletics
program. The basis of this relationship should be a model of
institutional control in which significant responsibilities for
administration and oversight are assigned to the faculty athletics
representative, as well as to the director of athletics. It is
important that the chief executive officer recognize that the range
of activities and the scope of the responsibilities of the faculty
athletics representative elevate this position above the level of
the typical faculty service appointment, and it is recommended that
those who hold this position have permanent tenure. Faculty
athletics representatives are as effective as their chief executive
officers empower them to be, both in terms of the responsibilities
assigned and the extent of institutional support provided.
The Statement of the Role of the Faculty Athletics Representative
(Appendix C), which was ratified by the membership of FARA,
outlines activities that are commonly undertaken by faculty
athletics representatives in those circumstances in which they are
adequately empowered and supported. A summary of such duties
follows.
Faculty Athletics Representatives and Academic Integrity of the
Athletics Program
Local duties of faculty athletics representatives vary from
institution, but in every case the faculty athletics representative
is or should be involved in the assurance of the academic integrity
of the athletics program and in the maintenance of the welfare of
the student-athlete.
Faculty Athletics Representatives Monitor Academic Performance of
Student-Athletes
Faculty athletics representatives will be called upon to review
information that relates to the academic well-being of the
student-athlete to ensure that the athletes who attend can and do
thrive academically. As a matter of course, they should be aware of
the academic credentials of entering student-athletes, the academic
attainment of continuing students and the rates at which
student-athletes graduate from the institution. Faculty athletics
representatives should have a role in the reporting to the faculty
and administration on the academic well-being of the
student-athletes. The faculty athletics representative coordinates
the nominations process for NCAA postgraduate scholarships.
Faculty Athletics Representatives are Involved in Delivery of
Academic Services to Student-Athletes
Faculty athletics representatives ensure that academic services
are available to student-athletes. They bring their experience as
educators and their understanding of faculty values to this
endeavor and influence the delivery of services, such as tutorials,
study table, academic advising and other services designed for the
academic enhancement of student-athletes.
The Advisory Role of the Faculty Athletics Representative
Faculty Athletics Representative as Senior Faculty Advisor on
Athletics to the Chief Executive Officer
The faculty athletics representative provides advise to the chief
executive officer that reflects the traditional values of the
faculty and which is rooted in the academic ethic of the
institution. To be an effective advisor, the faculty athletics
representative must be knowledgeable regarding the athletics
program and must devote the time and attention required to attain
this familiarity. To be useful in this role, the faculty athletics
representative should have access to information regarding all
aspects of the program. To ensure this access, the faculty
athletics representative needs to carry authority from the chief
executive officer, and this authority should be recognized on all
campus venues. [To illustrate the point, the faculty athletics
representative may or may not be involved in the discussions that
result in the creation of the athletics budget, but should be able,
on request, to have access to detailed information about that
budget.] The faculty athletics representative must have access to
the chief executive officer on a regular basis.
Faculty Athletics Representative Meets Regularly with the Director
of Athletics
The working relationship between the faculty athletics
representative and the director of athletics is very important.
Regular interaction between them is necessary, and wide-ranging
discussion of all aspects of the athletics program is encouraged.
This will help the faculty athletics representative to develop the
knowledge base needed to make effective contributions to local
athletics administration and will be useful to the director of
athletics in influencing the academic and personal well-being of
the student-athletes.
Faculty Athletics Representative as Member of Institutional
Athletics Committees
It is customary for faculty athletics representatives to be
members of institutional committees that influence the policies and
procedures of local athletics programs. This permits the faculty
athletics representative opportunities to contribute to the
continuing education of faculty and other members of these
committees by providing information and insight about NCAA or
conference processes, pending legislation or other important
issues. Faculty athletics representatives often serve as
chairpersons for these groups.
Faculty Athletics Representative Makes Regular Reports to Faculty
Senate
An efficient link between the faculty athletics representative and
the faculty senate is useful in assuring the faculty of accurate
and timely information regarding the athletics program. Whether
appointed by the chief executive officer or elected directly by the
faculty, the faculty athletics representative commonly serves as a
conduit of information to and from the faculty and the athletics
program. It is common for the faculty athletics representative to
report periodically to the faculty senate regarding the operation
of the athletics program.
Faculty Athletics Representative as a Delegate to the NCAA
Convention
The faculty athletics representative should represent the
institution as a delegate to the annual NCAA Conventions and attend
any special meetings of the NCAA. In many cases, the faculty
athletics representative is designated as the voting delegate in
the absence of the chief executive officer. He or she should be
involved in discussions with the chief executive officer and the
director of athletics in which the institution’s voting
position on NCAA legislation is established.
Faculty Athletics Representative and Financial Support
The faculty athletics representative will incur expenses in the
areas of travel, communications and supplies. Financial support for
the activities of the faculty athletics representative should come
from sources outside the athletics department. Because of the
oversight component of their duties, faculty athletics
representatives should exercise caution in accepting what might be
considered to be “perks” in conjunction with their
positions. It is recommended that campus policy regarding the
availability of tickets to athletics contests, athletically related
travel with teams (including postseason travel expenses), etc., be
clearly articulated and that there is an understanding between the
chief executive officer and the faculty athletics representative in
this regard.
Faculty Athletics Representatives and the Oversight of Personal
Welfare of Student-Athletes
Faculty Athletics Representatives Monitor Student-Athlete
Experience
As members of the faculty, it is appropriate that faculty
athletics representatives be involved in the monitoring and
maintenance of the personal welfare of the student-athletes. Many
of the activities of faculty athletics representatives directly
influence the personal well-being of student-athletes. This aspect
of their activities should be recognized by all constituencies of
the institution, and faculty athletics representatives should offer
themselves as independent sources of support and advise to
student-athletes. For example, they should know that missed-class
time policies are being honored and that graduations or
cancellations of financial aid are made for appropriate reasons.
They should know when student-athletes encounter difficulties with
class scheduling, and should be of assistance when the
student-athlete has occasion to be involved in waiver or appeals
procedures at the institution. Faculty athletics representatives
also should be alert to conditions that affect the health of
student-athletes, being ready to aid in referral to university
resources that provide advice and counsel on all types of physical
and psychological problems.
Faculty Athletics Representatives Meet with Student-Athlete
Advisory Committees
Student-athlete advisory committees, mandated by the NCAA for
every member institution, play a significant role in promoting the
academic, health, social and athletic welfare of student-athletes.
Faculty athletics representatives should be actively involved with
institutional student-athlete advisory committees. They should
regularly attend committee meetings and consult with committee
officers. Such direct and personal exchanges are useful in
obtaining current-first-hand assessments of student attitudes and
experiences and reinforce the understanding that the faculty
athletics representative is first and foremost a faculty member
interested in the welfare of athletes as students. Faculty
athletics representatives should facilitate the inclusion of
student-athlete participation on institutional athletics boards and
committees. They should also be knowledgeable about and be
supportive of the work of conference student-athlete advisory
committees (if applicable).
Faculty Athletics Representatives are Involved with Exit
Interviews
Faculty athletics representatives should either take part in the
mandated exit interviews at Division I institutions or review the
results of exit interviews with student-athletes as they depart the
athletics program. Over time, these exchanges can provide a useful
assessment of student perceptions of the health of the athletics
program, especially with regard to their interactions with coaches
and with the operating policies of the program.
Faculty Athletics Representatives and Institutional Compliance
with NCAA and Conference Regulations
Institutional control of an intercollegiate athletics program is a
campus-wide responsibility. In its discussion document titled
“Principles of Institutional Control,” the NCAA has
clearly specified that individuals outside the athletics program
are to exercise meaningful oversight of those aspects of the
athletics program that interact with other offices and departments
on the campus (e.g., admissions, financial aid). Faculty athletics
representatives are expected to take an active role in the
institutional control of the intercollegiate athletics program on
their campuses. Neither a lack of active involvement of the faculty
athletics representative in the institutional compliance effort,
nor unfamiliarity on the part of the faculty athletics
representative with NCAA regulations is excused by the NCAA, should
a major violation occur at the institution. Therefore it is of
critical importance that the role of the faculty athletics
representative in monitoring and assessment of the effectiveness of
the compliance effort of an institution be well-understood by the
CEO, and by all others involved.
Faculty Athletics Representatives and Compliance Contacts with the
NCAA
Faculty athletics representatives are empowered by NCAA
regulations to represent the institution in dealings with the NCAA.
Faculty athletics representatives routinely make requests to the
NCAA staff regarding interpretations. It is appropriate for faculty
athletics representatives to be involved in the preparation of
requests for waiver or appeals from NCAA regulation or process.
They are encouraged to attend annual regional rules seminars
sponsored by the NCAA and to avail themselves of written sources of
information regarding compliance matters, such as the NCAA Guide to
Rules Compliance, NCAA Guide to Financial Aid and NCAA Guide to
Eligibility. They also are encouraged to use, or familiarize
themselves with, the compliance software capabilities that are
provided by the NCAA membership services group.
Faculty Athletics Representatives and Student-Athlete
Eligibility
Faculty athletics representatives may or may not be involved
directly in certifying student-athletes as eligible for practice,
financial aid or intercollegiate competition. In all cases,
however, they should be knowledgeable in the procedures utilized
and should ensure that the individuals who are performing such
certifications are fully aware of all relevant NCAA legislation and
interpretations related to such matters. In addition, and at a
minimum, the faculty athletics representative should inspect
periodically such records for accuracy and to ensure appropriate
and complete documentation.
Faculty Athletics Representatives and Rules Violations
Faculty athletics representatives should play a central role in
any major institutional inquiries into alleged or suspected rules
violations. They should be involved in the preparation of written
reports of infractions that are made to the conference (if any) or
to the NCAA.
Faculty Athletics Representatives and FARA
History of FARA
The Faculty Athletics Representatives Association (FARA) had its
genesis in the mid-1980s when a group of faculty athletics
representatives initiated a series of forums. The purpose of these
forums, which were held in conjunction with the annual NCAA
Conventions, was to provide for discussion of issues that were of
concern to the NCAA membership. The first of these meetings was
held in Nashville in 1985, with other forums following on an annual
basis through 1988. At the special NCAA Convention held in Dallas
in June 1987, a faculty athletics representative task force was
established to facilitate contributions by faculty athletics
representatives to the reform agenda of the newly formed NCAA
Presidents Commission. In November 1987, the task force created the
faculty athletics representatives academic review committee to
assess the academic implications of legislation to be voted on at
the subsequent NCAA Convention. The committee, which included
representation from NCAA Divisions I, II and III, produced the
first of what has become a continuing series of printed reports
that are distributed to the NCAA membership to promote an
understanding of the academic impact of proposed legislation.
The work of the task force reached its culmination in 1989 in the
ratification of the bylaws of a new national organization for
faculty athletics representatives. This organization, FARA, was
designed to promote greater cohesion among faculty athletics
representatives and to enhance their usefulness within the NCAA and
at their respective institutions.
Organization of FARA
The membership of FARA includes all persons who hold appointments
at their institutions as faculty athletics representatives. The
organizational structure of FARA includes seven elected officers
– the President, President-Elect, Past President, Division I
Vice-President, Division II Vice-President, Division III
Vice-President and Secretary/Treasurer. The officers are elected to
one-year nonrenewable terms, with the exception of the
Secretary/Treasurer, who is elected to a two-year renewable term.
The 15-person executive committee includes the officers and eight
other members elected for one- year terms, with representation that
includes two from Division I-A, one each from Divisions I-AA and
I-AAA, and two each from Divisions II and III. The work of FARA is
facilitated by standing committees, including the nominating
committee and legislative review committees for each division. The
legislative review committee reviews issues affecting the welfare
of the student-athlete, in addition to academic implications of
proposed legislation. Other committees of FARA are formed on an ad
hoc basis. The structure of FARA is set forth in Appendix E.
Purposes of FARA
Faculty Athletics Representatives are in place to promote academic
integrity in intercollegiate athletics, to facilitate the
integration of the athletics and academic components of the
collegiate community, and to promote institutional control of
athletics on campuses. Under the auspices of the NCAA and in
concert with the Executive Committee, FARA's purpose is to enhance
the faculty athletics representative’s effectiveness in
pursuing these important goals. With support from the NCAA
membership services staff, FARA provides a collective voice for
faculty athletics representatives on collegiate athletics. FARA is
an active participant in the national dialogue on the importance of
academic values in the conduct of athletics programs and is
frequently solicited by various NCAA committees and constituent
organizations for a faculty perspective on a variety of topics.
FARA Programs and Activities
To enhance the utility and effectiveness of faculty athletics
representatives on campuses and with the NCAA, FARA sponsors a
variety of programs and activities. Each fall, the legislative
review committees conduct a review of proposed legislation to be
voted on at the subsequent NCAA Convention, pertaining to academic
standards or that which may otherwise impact the student-athlete,
and circulates their written reports to the membership. FARA also
conducts an annual meeting, as well as a meeting in conjunction
with the NCAA Convention. The agenda of each meeting fosters the
professional development of faculty athletics representatives
through discussion of topics pertinent to their campus
responsibilities. Training and orientation sessions for newly
appointed faculty athletics representatives are available at both
meetings. This aspect of FARA activities is particularly important
given the substantial turnover in faculty athletics
representatives. In addition, with budget and production assistance
from the NCAA, the association has developed a videotape
presentation to aid the orientation of new FARs and their chief
executive officers to the potential parameters of the faculty
athletics representative position. A Statement of the Role of the
Faculty Athletics Representative (see Appendix C) was developed and
formally adopted by the association in 1992. This statement
describes the duties and responsibilities a faculty athletics
representative might undertake in the administration of an
institution’s athletics program to promote the
program’s academic integrity and the well-being of
student-athletes.
Faculty Athletics Representatives and Athletics Conferences
The level and extent of the formal involvement of faculty
athletics representatives in the activities of athletics
conferences vary, both within and across divisional
classifications. In a small number of conferences, faculty
athletics representatives serve as conference officers, dominate
the conference committee structure and cast the votes by which
conference business is conducted. In most instances, they are much
less involved in the conduct of routing conference affairs.
The governance systems of most conferences include committees of
faculty athletics representatives. These groups usually meet
separately at conference meetings, providing faculty athletics
representatives with opportunities to express their opinions with
regard to conference operations, especially as they impact the
academic and personal well-being of student-athletes. The results
of deliberations of these committees are usually communicated to
general conference business meetings, either as items of
information or for vote.
A survey of activities of faculty athletics representatives in
conferences across all NCAA divisions indicates that they typically
provide advice and/or oversight in the following conference
activities, especially as they impact the academic and personal
well-being of student-athletes.
*Faculty athletics representatives often hold discussions that
promote better understanding of NCAA regulations and how they
affect conference members.
*Faculty athletics representatives often hold discussions
regarding NCAA violations that involve conference members and
discuss how best to maintain high ethical standards of conduct
among conference members.
*Faculty athletics representatives often discuss conference
schedules of contests to assess their impact on academic welfare of
student-athletes. Special attention is paid to final examination
schedules of conference institutions.
*Faculty athletics representatives often are involved in
conference decisions that relate to waivers of conference
eligibility requirements, especially academic requirements.
*Faculty athletics representatives often are involved in the
discussions that determine the voting position of the conference at
NCAA Conventions.
*Faculty athletics representatives often are involved in
determining recipients of conference academic honors.
APPENDIX A
Essential Faculty Athletics Representative
Responsibilities and Support Services
Responsibilities.
1. The faculty athletics representative should ensure, either
directly or indirectly, that student-athletes meet all NCAA,
conference and institutional requirements for eligibility for
practice, financial aid and intercollegiate competition. This
should include both initial and continuing academic eligibility
requirements for both freshmen and transfer student-athletes. These
certifications should be performed by the faculty athletics
representative, performed under the direction of the faculty
athletics representative, or, at a minimum, periodically reviewed
and audited by the faculty athletics representative. Academic
eligibility certifications should be performed by a person outside
of the department of athletics.
2. The faculty athletics representative should develop, or arrange
to have developed, periodic statistical reports on the academic
preparation and performance of student-athletes for each sports
team. This information should be provided to the chief executive
officer, the athletics board or committee, the athletics
administration and head coaches. The faculty athletics
representative should be knowledgeable about the academic
preparation and performance of each sports team and should use such
reports to uphold high academic standards and expectations for
these team members.
3. The faculty athletics representative should be responsible,
either directly or indirectly, for institutional compliance
activities or responsibilities, which involve campus entities
outside the athletics department. Such entities include, but are
not limited to, the following: (a) office of student financial aid,
(b) office of undergraduate admissions, (c) office of the registrar
and (d) offices of the academic vice-president and the deans of
several colleges. The faculty athletics representative should work
in concert with the director of athletics to ensure a comprehensive
and effective rules education and compliance program on the
campus.
4. The faculty athletics representative should be knowledgeable
about the NCAA and conference rules related to academic
eligibility, transfer requirements, and restrictions and
enforcement procedures. He or she should participate, or otherwise
be fully informed about, institutional investigations of
allegations of rules violations. No infractions report to either
the NCAA or a conference should leave the campus until it has been
reviewed by the FAR. He or she should play a major and direct role
in matters that potentially involve major violations of NCAA
rules.
5. The faculty athletics representative should have direct contact
with student-athletes on a systematic and periodic basis. He or she
should participate in new student-athlete orientation activities
and should interact frequently with student-athlete advisory
committees. Student-athletes should recognize the FAR as a source
of information, support and counseling, which is located
administratively outside of the athletics department.
6. The faculty athletics representative should be a senior advisor
outside of the athletics department to the chief executive officer
on matters related to intercollegiate athletics. Together, with the
director of athletics, the faculty athletics representative should
formulate and recommend institutional positions on NCAA legislation
and other matters affecting, or related to, intercollegiate
athletics on the campus.
7. The faculty athletics representative should represent the
institution to the NCAA and to the athletics conferences (if
any).
8. The faculty athletics representative should be an active member
of the campus intercollegiate athletics board or committee.
Support Services.
The faculty athletics representative should be provided support
services commensurate with the duties and responsibilities of the
office. Such support services could include some or all of the
following:
1. Release time from teaching responsibilities (with compensation
to the affected academic unit, as appropriate).
2. Summer support, including the possibility of a fiscal-year
contract.
3. Full- or part-time secretarial assistance.
4. A computer with connections to the institution’s
mainframe computer system for access to the admissions, academic
and financial aid records of student-athletes.
5. A travel budget sufficient to support travel to the meetings of
FARA, the annual NCAA Convention and any additional or special NCAA
meetings. Faculty athletics representatives also should receive
travel support to attend semi-annual conference meetings.
APPENDIX
B
Checklist of Faculty Athletics Representative
Duties
1. Develop a written job description, which accurately and fully
describes the duties and responsibilities.
2. Obtain approval of the job description from the chief executive
officer and faculty governance structure.
3. Identify the resources needed to successfully meet the
responsibilities and arrange for these resources to be made
available.
4. Learn the rules, especially those contained in NCAA Bylaws 14,
13 and 15 (in that order of priority).
5. Establish control or oversight of academic eligibility
decisions.
6. Together with the chief executive officer and the director of
athletics, develop a comprehensive plan for the institutional
control of intercollegiate athletics and ensure that appropriate
and explicit assignments of both responsibility and authority are
made.
7. Be visible to the student-athletes. Participate in orientation
activities at the beginning of the year and exit-interview
activities at the end of the year. Support the student-athlete
advisory committee and other similar activities on the campus.
8. Report all secondary and major violations to the NCAA (or
conference, if applicable). Be knowledgeable about all
institutional investigations and have access to all infractions
reports before they are submitted to the NCAA (or conference, if
applicable).
9. Establish solid working relationships with the director of
athletics, the compliance coordinator, the director of admissions,
the registrar and director of student financial aid.
10. Be active in working with the institution’s athletics
board or committee and report regularly to the institution’s
faculty governance structure.
11. Be positive about the good things in intercollegiate
athletics, but do not attempt to be an apologist for those things
that are problematic and require change.
12. Participate on search committees for senior athletics
department administrators and head coaches.
13. Be cautious when accepting perks, which could be misunderstood
by the campus or external communities.
APPENDIX
C
Statement of the Role of the
Faculty Athletics Representative
Introduction
This statement has been developed to emphasize the strategic role
that the faculty athletics representative (FAR) should play to
ensure academic integrity, facilitate institutional control of
intercollegiate athletics and enhance the student-athlete
experience. Although chief executive officer (CEO) control of the
intercollegiate athletics program is essential, this goal is more
likely to be attained through appropriate delegation of both
responsibility and authority on the campus. Of all of the major
participants in the administration of the intercollegiate athletics
program, those who represent the faculty are most likely to be
independent of the financial and other pressures that create
enormous incentives for competitive success in the
revenue-producing sports. Senior faculty members are able to
provide significant leadership in the governance of athletics
programs on their campuses if they are empowered by their CEOs and
their faculty governance structures to do so, and if they are
provided adequate institutional support to fully discharge their
responsibilities.
The common bond that links FARs across all NCAA member
institutions is a commitment to academic integrity. Beyond this
goal, FAR roles vary both among and within divisional
classifications.
The roles of the faculty-dominated athletics boards or committees
also may differ. In this statement, the “role of the
FAR” should be broadly interpreted to include the activities
of the athletics boards and committees that also are charged to
represent faculty perspectives in the governance of intercollegiate
athletics.
Obviously, this statement is not intended to be binding on either
individual FARs or member institution. It does contain, however,
guidelines that merit diligent consideration on the part of those
who select or appoint the FAR and on the part of the faculty
members who are asked to consider such appointments.
Academic
Integrity
The academic integrity of an intercollegiate athletics program may
be evaluated in a number of ways, including a review of: the
admissions profiles of recruited student-athletes vs. all students
who are admitted to the institution; courses and academic programs
selected by student-athletes; the semester and cumulative records
of academic performance of student-athletes and the rates at which
they graduate. The FAR periodically should review appropriate
records (for both individual student-athletes and for sport teams)
to ensure that decisions related to admissions, academic advising,
evaluation of academic performance and the extent of academic
support services are made in ways that are consistent with the
primary academic mission of the institution.
The FAR should ensure that the institution has in place effective
mechanisms for evaluating whether student-athletes have met all of
the academic eligibility requirements for practice, financial aid
and intercollegiate competition established by the NCAA, the
conference (if any) and the institution. The FAR need not perform
these certifications personally, but should ensure that all
certifications for both initial and continuing academic eligibility
have been performed correctly, and with adequate documentation.
The FAR should assume an advisory and reporting role with respect
to the academic preparation and performance of student-athletes.
The FAR may prepare (or requires on the basis of FAR
specifications) periodic reports on the academic preparation and
performance of student-athletes. Such reports should be carefully
reviewed by the FAR and discussed with the CEO, the faculty and the
athletics department.
Compliance
Institutional control of intercollegiate athletics is a
campus-wide responsibility. Unless the institution has designated
an athletics compliance coordinator who reports directly to the CEO
(or another senior-level administrator outside the athletics
department), the FAR and the director of athletics should assume
joint responsibility for ensuring compliance with all NCAA,
conference (if any) and institutional rules. Consistent with the
guidelines provided by the NCAA’s principles of institutional
control discussion document, FAR responsibilities should include
oversight of compliance-related activities undertaken within the
athletics department and coordination of the compliance-related
activities of the campus units located outside the athletics
department. Such efforts could focus on academic-eligibility
certifications (noted above), rules education and staff training,
rules interpretations, and periodic spot-checks of records to
ensure that all institutional compliance systems are engaged and
functioning. Even if the institution has appointed a compliance
coordinator who reports directly to the CEO, the FAR should retain
significant responsibilities for institutional-control structures
and activities.
The FAR should play a central role in any major institutional
inquiry into alleged or suspected rules violations and in the
preparation of any infractions reports submitted to the conference
(if any) or the NCAA.
The FAR should receive the results of any periodic audits of the
athletics department that may be conducted.
The FAR should play a major role in any NCAA athletics
certification program reviews.
Intercollegiate athletics programs offer privileges that include
financial assistance, team membership, competitive opportunities
and numerous additional support services. Such privileges create a
heightened visibility of student-athletes both on and beyond the
campus. Hence, student-athletes must accept some additional
responsibilities for their behavior that are not imposed on
students generally. The FAR, together with the athletics
administration, should ensure that appropriate standards of
student-athlete conduct are established (for both on- and
off-campus behavior), clearly communicated and consistently
enforced.
Student-Athlete
Experience
The FAR should promote a balance between academics, athletics and
the social lives of student-athletes, which affords them
opportunities to enjoy the full range of collegiate experiences
available to students generally. Examples of such activities
include a review of travel and competition schedules (to minimize
missed class time), reviews of athletics scholarship cancellations
or reductions (which might inappropriately limit opportunities for
student-athletes to complete their degrees), periodic review of the
mechanisms used to monitor the hourly and weekly limitations on
athletically related activities, and the actions to encourage the
availability of post eligibility financial support for
student-athletes. The FAR should participate in student-athlete
exit interviews, facilitate student-athlete participation on
athletics boards and committees, and inform student-athletes about
the FAR role as an independent source of counsel, assistance and
information.
The FAR should encourage and facilitate interactions between
student-athletes and mainstream institutional activities. At the
beginning of each academic year, the FAR should address
student-athletes as a group, or in individual team meetings, to
emphasize the primacy of the academic mission of the institution
and the responsibilities of student-athletes within that setting.
Further, the FAR should utilize every opportunity to reinforce the
principle that student-athletes are students who are to be afforded
opportunities to participate in a variety of institutional
experiences.
The FAR should encourage student-athletes to prepare for careers
outside (or in some instances, associate with) their experiences as
intercollegiate athletes. To this end, the FAR should ensure that
testing, counseling, evaluation and other career-planning services
are made available to student-athletes.
Communication/Administration
The FAR should play a central role in discussions of matters
related to intercollegiate athletics at athletics board or
committee meetings and at faculty or institutional senate meetings.
At these meetings, the FAR should provide periodic reports related
to matters of academic integrity, academic preparation and
performance of student-athletes, rules compliance or violations,
and other matters related to the intercollegiate athletics program.
Faculty and other members of the institutional community should
have an opportunity to learn about the work of the FAR and to raise
relevant questions or concerns with the FAR. The FAR should serve
as a member, or as chair, of the institution’s athletics
board or committee.
The FAR should have access to complete budgetary information about
the athletics department.
The FAR should play an important role in the shaping of
institutional voting decisions on conference and NCAA
legislation.
The FAR, as an appointee of the CEO, must have access to the CEO
and must be recognized as a key advisor on athletics-related
matters by the CEO and others involved in the administration of
intercollegiate athletics. The FAR also must have access to a
working relationship with the director of athletics and his or her
staff. The FAR should have a major role in the institutional
searches for key athletics department personnel.
Institutional
Resources/Compensation
The CEO must ensure that the FAR and the faculty members who share
the responsibilities identified above are allocated the time and
institutional resources consistent with their duties. This support
could include clerical staff, release time from teaching or other
duties, and additional compensation during the academic or fiscal
year. In addition, deans, department chairs and other institutional
administrators should acknowledge that the FAR’s activities
described above require a significant commitment of time and
energy. No faculty member should accept appointment to the position
of FAR without a commitment of institutional resources consistent
with these responsibilities and a pledge of institutional
recognition of the time and energies required for these duties to
be effectively discharged.
Athletically related perquisites (team travel, tickets, etc.)
provided to the FAR should be subject to annual approval by the
CEO. Where possible, it would be desirable to have the expenses
associated with such perquisites paid through the office of the
CEO, not the athletics department.
APPENDIX
D
Resolution Regarding the Appointment of
Faculty Athletics Representatives
WHEREAS, the Faculty Athletics Representatives Association
recognizes the importance of shared governance at its member
institutions and the critical role of faculty athletics
representatives in communicating with the faculty role of faculty
athletics representatives in communicating with the faculty as a
whole; and
WHEREAS, the Faculty Athletics Representatives Association
recognizes the benefits of faculty athletics representatives who
provide long term service to their institutions; and
WHEREAS, said benefits include effectiveness in the performance of
their duties, and the opportunity to provide a unique perspective
and an experienced faculty voice in the governance of the NCAA and
FARA; and
WHEREAS, the Faculty Athletics Representatives Association is
committed to diversity throughout intercollegiate athletics and,
especially, in its ranks; therefore,
Be it RESOLVED,
That the following statement be adopted as the official
recommendation of the Faculty Athletics Representatives
Association, that this policy be communicated to the chief
executive officer of each member institution, and that this policy
be included in the Faculty Athletics Representatives Handbook and
all appropriate faculty athletics representatives materials:
THE FACULTY
ATHLETICS REPRESENTATIVES ASSOCIATION
RECOMMENDS:
1) that faculty athletics representatives be appointed through a
process that should include consultation with the appropriate
shared governance bodies.
2) that there be no predetermined limit to the length of time that
such faculty athletics representatives may serve.
3) that member institutions strongly consider the appointment of
women and minorities to the position of faculty athletics
representative.

